Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
301 redirect subdirectory to new domain
-
I'm planning on using 301 redirects to spin out a subdirectory of my current website to be its own separate domain. For instance, I currently have a website www.website.com and my writers write tech news at www.website.com/news. Now I want to 301 redirect www.website.com/news to www.technews.com.
Will this have any negative impact on SEO? What are some steps that I can take to minimize these impacts?
-
Hi Guys,
I know this topic's a little old but my e-commerce website is basically at the verge of undergoing the same changes, and I've got a lot of ranking-based concerns here.
Our website ist called absinthes.com. It's available in 3 languages, so we created sub directories absinthes.com/de and absinthes.com/fr. The English version basically is always the default version when visiting absinthes.com.
For various reasons, our company decided to split absinthes.com into 3 separate shops: absinthes.com for English, absinthes.fr for French, and absinthes.de for German.
Now here's where I start getting worried: We're moving contents from a subdirectory (absinthes.com/de) via 301 page-by-page redirects to this new domain, absinthes.de. Am I supposed to let Google through Search Console know about this move, or will it think the entire site (absinthes.com, absinthes.com/fr) has then moved to absinthes.de?
Is it enough to put rel=canonical tags and 301 redirects in place to make sure we're not losing any of our rankings on both ends?
Would really appreciate your quick opinion on this, thanks so much!
-
Hi Chris,
Happy to be of help.
Thomas
-
Thanks for the thorough response Thomas!
-
Thank you Moosa,
I just took a look at where www.technews.com links to and that gave me the vastly more insight to what they are trying to accomplish and makes me believe that they will survive without the tech section
unfortunately, the non-www.version takes you to a dead page.
I would not worry too much about losing page rank based on the site it links to most likely being the new site you are speaking of I doubt this is a secret because you showed us the domain that points to it. of course I will not put that URL on here out of respect for you but I have placed the URL you mentioned above so people will know what you are referring to.
However, if you are going to go through with this I would place quality content on technews.com and take away the 301 redirect that points back to the main news site
I would then do something similar to what Moz did when they moved from SEOmoz.org to Moz.com they made http://moz.com/rand/ a live site that contained high-quality unique content in order to warm up the audience to the domain as well as Google
only if you are going to splice these things into two different sites would I go ahead and move your technology information over to technews.com domain and place all that content on it.
I would also want to inform your current readers of exactly what is going to occur.
In less you are going to really start going crazy on technology and have an entire business plan based around it which I am pretty sure you do if you are planning on doing this.
Then I would move forward with changing the tech section of your current site to become the beginning of technews.com ( I have made this a live link to where the www. version of it links so people can be of better help by under understanding the scale of this change.)
Unfortunately, any traffic, links, social media approvals, page rank and everything that is currently helping you rank with your news technology section will disappear. as soon as Google crawls the site and notices the 301 redirects.
Because you are not changing domains like when SEOmoz.org became Moz.com it is very unique that this type of thing occurs. Though I can understand now why you would want to do it.
I would recommend taking a tool like http://deepcrawl.co.uk/ and having it run a universal index on your current news site the reason I recommend Deep Crawl is I have used it with great success on extremely large sites over 1 million URI's it has the ability to scale Because it is not based on how much your local workstation or desktop has for RAM I believe it is hosted on AWS regardless because it is hosted it allows it to process the data on huge sites I usedit on the one Fortune 500 that I cannot name however it did a fantastic job.
if you read the information on this site you will see just how capable and indispensable tool like this is when making changes to a site a as large as your news site
http://deepcrawl.co.uk/features/advanced-processing
Another tool you should not be without my opinion is Screaming Frog SEO Spider though for the amount of pages that you will need to crawl you will need a workstation with a lot of RAM as it does many of the same things deep crawl does however requires you to install it on your local workstation or desktop it can be installed on Mac, PC and Linux though I have placed it on a Verizon Terremark server running Ubuntu with 24 gigs of RAM with a lot of success there are other things you will want it around for checking. I would purchase the Pro version Of
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
I would then use a combination of Moz http://moz.com/researchtools/ose , https://ahrefs.com/ , http://www.majesticseo.com/ & Google Webmaster tools or www.google.com/webmasters/ to look at the back links pointing to technology.
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://moz.com/blog/domain-migration-lessons
http://moz.com/blog/web-site-migration-guide-tips-for-seos
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/83105?
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://builtvisible.com/domain-migration/
http://builtvisible.com/surviving-seo-site-migration/
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067216/The-10-Step-Site-Migration-Process
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-practices-when-moving-your-site.html
a larger version of the photo below is right here
http://www.aleydasolis.com/images/seo-website-domain-migration.gif
I would follow the directions that are laid out in the URLs below because making a mistake when doing this will be costly to your new satellite business.
Hosting your new site on a server that you trust to have the capability to host it protect it is paramount to it surviving
Peek Hosting http://www.peakhosting.com/
Terremark http://www.terremark.com/
FireHost http://www.firehost.com/
To gain speed and reliability I would recommend not using the current DNS setup
ns-1027.awsdns-00.org
pdns6.ultradns.co.uksimply because AWS route 53 or ns-1027.awsdns-00.org depends on both DynECT Dyn.com & UltraDNS http://www.neustar.biz/services/dns-services is to keep itself alive and meaning if in the extremely unlikely instance of both of them going down you are out of luck.
However, your current setup depends on a secondary DNS that depends on your primary DNS being up I hope that makes sense.
I would simply do what many other companies that do not want down time and need very fast name servers do use DynECT along with UltraDNS or combine DynECT with EdgeCast Route DNS
Amazon.com is not backed up by AWS Route 53 as you can see below it is a combination of DynECT & UltraDNS two keep your site from having issues so it is not a good
use
ns1.p1.dynect.net & ns1.edgecastdns.net
or
ns1.p1.dynect.net & pdns1.ultradns.net
or just ns1.p1.dynect.net
UltraDNS had a bout of downtime less than a month ago on salesforce
Dyn has never been down ever look At the Way, Amazon configures their server DNS.
http://who.is/whois/amazon.com
Name Server: ns4.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: ns3.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns2.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns1.p31.dynect.net
http://who.is/whois/technews.com
Name Server: pdns3.ultradns.org
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns5.ultradns.info
Name Server: pdns2.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns4.ultradns.org
Sincerely,
Thomas
PS large version of the photograph below his right here http://imgur.com/X3AiQNi.gif
-
Very Detailed answer y Thomas!!
If I have the similar kind of situation the first thing I would do is to audit the current website and will make sure the area that I am going to redirect have what kind of links and what impact they are producing to the website whole website.
If the section, I want to redirect have a major impact on rankings, now I have to make a decision. Can I afford a dip in ranking? And how users will react and respond to the new separate website.
I will recommend you to do your analysis and as there not much in your hand make sure what you want to achieve and what you can put at risk, make a back -up plan and start doing it.
Hope this helps!!
-
Some of the negative things that will happen to your current site include losing whatever page rank your current links that will be redirected contained.
When you 301 redirect a link to another site that is off of a subfolder it will impact your entire site's ability to rank if those 301s were helping you at all.
Are you going to continue to operate the first site as it was?
I would have to see the page rank of the site how many links you have that you are talking about redirecting and much more to actually tell you whether or not it is worth
harming their old site
it may not be worth it and it might be best to simply move the /news content and not redirect the pages themselves. To technews.com
There is not much that you can really do to in the impact of losing links of value to your current site except for build new exceptional content that gains the same quality and amount of links that you will be redirecting to the other site.
Also remember you will be losing any social media likes thumbs up's whatever when you 301 redirect.
I assume the first domain has nothing to do with tech news that is why you are splicing it off?
I would choose between creating a new site with the old site's content and of course deleting that content has to not have duplicate content because remember whichever domain has the highest page rank wins meaning your existing domain if it has a page rank will take away the technews.com site's ability to rank for that content. I would place information telling somebody that this page is now able to be found at technews.com/what-ever-the-pages
I hope you know not to just 301 redirect /news to the new domains homepage and think that will be the best way of doing things because it will not. Redirects are done page by page meaning if you had a news/opinions/ you could place it in technews.com/opinions/
That would more or less help the new site more than it would the old site.
If I could see the domain of the first site if you want to send it to me via private message I am more than happy to look at it that way if you are uncomfortable showing it in the form.
I hope this is of help,
Thomas
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using a Reverse Proxy and 301 redirect to appear Sub Domain as Sub Directory - what are the SEO Risks?
We’re in process to move WordPress blog URLs from subdomains to sub-directory. We aren’t moving blog physically, but using reverse proxy and 301 redirection to do this. Blog subdomain URL is https://blog.example.com/ and destination sub-directory URL is https://www.example.com/blog/ Our main website is e-commerce marketplace which is YMYL site. This is on Windows server. Due to technical reasons, we can’t physically move our WordPress blog to the main website. Following is our Technical Setup Setup a reverse proxy at https://www.example.com/blog/ pointing to https://blog.example.com/ Use a 301 redirection from https://blog.example.com/ to https://www.example.com/blog/ with an exception if a traffic is coming from main WWW domain then it won’t redirect. Thus, we can eliminate infinite loop. Change all absolute URLs to relative URLs on blog Change the sitemap URL from https://blog.example.com/sitemap.xml to https://www.example.com/blog/sitemap.xml and update all URLs mentioned within the sitemap. SEO Risk Evaluation We have individual GA Tracking ID and individual Google Search Console Properties for main website and blog. We will not merge them. Keep them separate as they are. Keeping this in mind, I am evaluating SEO Risks factors Right now when we receive traffic from main website to blog (or vice versa) then it is considered as referral traffic and new cookies are set for Google Analytics. What’s going to happen when its on the same domain? Which type of settings change should I do in Blog’s Google Search Console? (A). Do I need to request “Change of Address” in the Blog’s search console property? (B). Should I re-submit the sitemap? Do I need to re-submit the blog sitemap from the https://www.example.com/ Google Search Console Property? Main website is e-commerce marketplace which is YMYL website, and blog is all about content. So does that impact SEO? Will this dilute SEO link juice or impact on the main website ranking because following are the key SEO Metrices. (A). Main website’s Avg Session Duration is about 10 minutes and bounce rate is around 30% (B). Blog’s Avg Session Duration is 33 seconds and bounce rate is over 92%
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | joshibhargav_200 -
Is there any benefit to changing 303 redirects to 301?
A year ago I moved my marketplace website from http to https. I implemented some design changes at the same time, and saw a huge drop in traffic that we have not recovered from. I've been searching for reasons for the organic traffic decline and have noticed that the redirects from http to https URLs are 303 redirects. There's little information available about 303 redirects but most articles say they don't pass link juice. Is it worth changing them to 301 redirects now? Are there risks in making such a change a year later, and is it likely to have any benefits for rankings?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MAdeit0 -
Redirecting to a new domain... a second time
Hi all, I help run a website for a history-themed podcast and we just moved it to its second domain in 7 years. We've had very good SEO up until last week, and I'm wondering if I screwed up the way I redirected the domains. It's like this: Originally the site was hosted at "first.com", and it acquired inbound links. However, we then started to host the site on blogger, so we... Redirected the site to "second.blogspot.com". (Thus, 1 --> 2) It stayed here for about 7 years and got lots of traffic. Two weeks ago we moved it off of blogger and into Wordpress, so we 301 redirected everything to... third.com. (Thus, 1 --> 2 --> 3) The redirects worked, and when we Google individual posts, we are now seeing them in Google's index at the new URL. My question: What about the 1--> 2 redirect? There are still lots of links pointing to "first.com". Last week I went into my GoDaddy settings and changed the first redirect, so that first.com now points to third.com. (Thus 1 --> 3, and 2-->3) I was correct in doing that, right? The drop in Google traffic I've seen this past week makes me think that maybe I screwed something up. Should we have kept 1 --> 2 --> 3? (Again, now we have 1-->3 and 2-->3) Thanks for any insights on this! Tom
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TomNYC1 -
How do you 301 redirect URLs with a hashbang (#!) format? We just lost a ton of pagerank because we thought javascript redirect was the only way! But other sites have been able to do this – examples and details inside
Hi Moz, Here's more info on our problem, and thanks for reading! We’re trying to Create 301 redirects for 44 pages on site.com. We’re having trouble 301 redirecting these pages, possibly because they are AJAX and have hashbangs in the URLs. These are locations pages. The old locations URLs are in the following format: www.site.com/locations/#!new-york and the new URLs that we want to redirect to are in this format: www.site.com/locations/new-york We have not been able to create these redirects using Yoast WordPress SEO plugin v.1.5.3.2. The CMS is WordPress version 3.9.1 The reason we want to 301 redirect these pages is because we have created new pages to replace them, and we want to pass pagerank from the old pages to the new. A 301 redirect is the ideal way to pass pagerank. Examples of pages that are able to 301 redirect hashbang URLs include http://www.sherrilltree.com/Saddles#!Saddles and https://twitter.com/#!RobOusbey.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DA20130 -
301 redirection pointing to noindexed pages
I have rather an unusual situation where a recently launched affiliate site does not have any unique content as its all syndicated content. For that reason we are currently using the noindex,nofollow meta tags to keep the pages out of the search engines index until we create unique content for the pages. The problem is that due to a very tight timeframe with rebranding, we are looking at 301 redirecting (on a page to page basis) another high authority legacy domain to this new site before we have had a chance to add unique content to it and remove the noindex,nofollow tags. I would assume that any link authority normally passed through the 301 would be lost in this scenario but Im uncertain of what the broader impact might be. Has anyone dealt with a similar scenario? I know this scenario is not ideal and I would rather wait until the unique content is up and noindex tags are removed before launching the 301 redirect of the legacy domain but there are a number of competing priorities at play outside of SEO.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LosNomads0 -
What are the effects of having Multiple Redirects for pages under the same domain
Dear Mozers, First of all let me wish you all a Very Happy, Prosperous, Healthy, Joyous & Successful New Year ! I'm trying to analyze one of the website's Web Hosting UK Com Ltd. and during this process I've had this question running through my mind. This project has been live since the year 2003 and since then there have be changes made to the website (obviously). There have also been new pages been added, the same way some new pages have even been over-written with changes in the url structures too. Now, coming back to the question, if I've have a particular url structure in the past when the site was debuted and until date the structure has been changes thrice (for example) with a 301 redirect to every back dated structure, WOULD it impact the sites performance SEOwise ? And let's say that there's hundreds of such redirections under the same domain, don't you think that after a period of time we should remove the past pages/urls from the server ? That'd certainly increase the 404 (page not found) errors, but that can be taken care of. How sensible would it be to keep redirecting the bots from one url to the other when they only visit a site for a short stipulated time? To make it simple let me explain it with a real life scenario. Say if I was staying a place A then switched to a different location in another county say B and then to C and so on, and finally got settled at a place G. When I move from one place to another, I place a note of the next destination I'm moving to so that any courier/mail etc. can be delivered to my current whereabouts. In such a case there's a less chance that the courier would travel all the destinations to deliver the package. Similarly, when a bot visits a domain and it finds multiple redirects, don't you think that it'd loose the efficiency in crawling the site? Ofcourse, imo. the redirects are important, BUT it should be there (in htaccess) for only a period of say 3-6 months. Once the search engine bots know about the latest pages, the past pages/redirects should be removed. What are your opinions about this ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eukmark0 -
Language Detection redirect: 301 or 302?
We have a site offering a voip app in 4 languages. Users are currently 302 redirected from the root page to /language subpages, depending on their browser language. Discussions about the sense of this aside: Is it correct to use a 302 redirect here or should users be 301 redirected to their respective languages? I don't find any guideline on this whatsoever...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | zeepartner1 -
New Site: Use Aged Domain Name or Buy New Domain Name?
Hi,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | peterwhitewebdesign
I have the opportunity to build a new website and use a domain name that is older than 5 years or buy a new domain name. The aged domain name is a .net and includes a keyword.
The new domain would include the same keyword as well as the U.S. state abbreviation. Which one would you use and why? Thanks for your help!0